“Process efficiency does not lead to technology dominance.”

Regarding artificial intelligence, “the government is committed to a draft law that allows a clear distinction between an effective process and a humane process,” and the “new judicial humanism” must be vigorously defended. In this scenario, it is necessary to avoid the need for efficiency turning into a predominance of technology, at the expense of human presence and decision-making. If the investigating judge had all the trial documents in his database and had an algorithm that would allow him to ask the AI ​​to take precautionary action “against Tizio or Caio,” the decision would be drawn up in three minutes, maybe even less. However, this would be blatant barbarism as it would significantly reverse the decision-making process and insult Article 102 of the Constitution. This is what the Deputy Minister of Justice said Francesco Paolo SistoSpeech at the annual meeting of Melchior Gioia.

Sisto continued: “Therefore, the principle that we established with Article 14 of Government Bill No. 1146 must be ‘marked’, that is, ‘marked’.”

Also read other news about him Nova News

Click here and get updates on WhatsApp

Follow us on Nova News social media channels twitter, LinkedIn, instagram, cable