HConservatives and liberals are no longer alone in complaining about strategic oversensitivity, vigilantism, and bans on speaking. Several authors on the left have also flatly criticized the double standards of progressive tribalism, complaining that the social question has been lost sight of because of all the symbolic battles for recognition, including playwright Bernd Stegemann, political scientist Nancy Fraser and playwright Bernd Stegemann. Secular activist Caroline Forrest.
Susan Neiman joins us here as well. “The Left Has Not Woke Up” is the title of the book, in which the American philosopher, who lived in Germany for many years, director of the Potsdam Einstein Forum and avowed socialist, adds a little something new to the heated debate. But it goes much harder and shoots all the way over the target.
Susan Neiman: “The Left Has Not Woke Up.” Translated from English by Christiana Goldman.
:
Photo: Hanser Berlin
For Neiman, the terms “woke” and “identity politics” symbolize a left that wrongly claims that title because at some point it lost the three core ideals of leftist thought—universalism, progress, and justice. Walker’s activism remains driven by traditional leftist motives such as compassion and anger at the suffering of the oppressed. But these feelings have now gone off course, and vigilance is turning towards the right-wing camp instead of standing against it.
A monster called “theory”
When and how this fall from grace occurred, we initially know no further details about it. However, the main reason is mysterious: theory. “What a wide range of intellectual movements associate with the word ‘theory’ is a rejection of the cognitive conceptual framework and political assumptions that were the legacy of the Enlightenment.”
As one contemplates these strange “intellectual movements,” Neiman gleefully continues: “Theory” is often deeply rooted in reactionism, elitism, and heavy jargon. It produces texts that “even a PhD is not enough to understand,” yet its lethal influence extends beyond academia and into the mainstream. Neiman argues that there is only one way to tackle this monster that turns leftists into woke people: “I wrote this book in the hope that philosophy could resolve the confusion created by theory.”
Spear of enlightenment
This hope is disappointed simply because the naive comparison between evil, arrogant right-wing theory and good, understandable, people-friendly philosophy leads to further confusion. Neiman certainly proves she can argue with confidence. For example, when she defends Enlightenment thought – which plays a special role in all her books – against popular contemporary accusations, she writes clearly and clearly: Kant, Diderot and their companions were not infallible. However, they were not suitable to be scapegoats for legitimizing racism, colonialism and Eurocentrism.
“Explorer. Communicator. Music geek. Web buff. Social media nerd. Food fanatic.”
More Stories
A review of Rhengling at Erfurt Theater
MrBeast Sued Over 'Unsafe Environment' on Upcoming Amazon Reality Show | US TV
A fossilized creature may explain a puzzling drawing on a rock wall.